Filed: Mar. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2014
Summary: Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered November 7, 2012, which, after a hearing, found that plaintiff had standing to bring the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 33508(U). Plaintiff's standing is predicated upon an alleged oral assignment between itself and its affiliate, nonparty Trade Deals Pte., Ltd. ( see M.S. Textiles v Rafaella Sportswear, 293 A.D.2d 261 [1st Dept 2002]). The motion court found that an oral assi
Summary: Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered November 7, 2012, which, after a hearing, found that plaintiff had standing to bring the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 33508(U). Plaintiff's standing is predicated upon an alleged oral assignment between itself and its affiliate, nonparty Trade Deals Pte., Ltd. ( see M.S. Textiles v Rafaella Sportswear, 293 A.D.2d 261 [1st Dept 2002]). The motion court found that an oral assig..
More
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered November 7, 2012, which, after a hearing, found that plaintiff had standing to bring the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 33508(U).
Plaintiff's standing is predicated upon an alleged oral assignment between itself and its affiliate, nonparty Trade Deals Pte., Ltd. (see M.S. Textiles v Rafaella Sportswear, 293 A.D.2d 261 [1st Dept 2002]). The motion court found that an oral assignment between plaintiff and Trade Deals could be effected by the 99% owner of the companies, who actively managed both businesses, without the participation of others (e.g. shareholders or directors). This finding was based on the court's determination that the owner, who testified, inter alia, that plaintiff's recovery in this action would be shared with Trade Deals, was credible; that determination is entitled to deference.
